A. Jemal, R. Siegel, E. Ward, T. Murray, J. Q. Xu, and M. J. Thun. Cancer statistics. CA-Cancer. J. Clin.57:43–66 (2007).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
A. A. Forastiere. Head and neck cancer: Overview of recent developments and future directions. Semin. Oncol. 27:1–4 (2000).PubMedGoogle Scholar
I. Ganly and S. B. Kaye. Recurrent squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck: Overview of current therapy and future prospects. Ann. Oncol.11:11–16 (2000).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
N. H. Shah, A. S. Railkar, F. C. Chen, R. Tarantino, S. Kumar, M. Murjani, D. Palmer, M. H. Infeld, and A. W. Malick. A biodegradable injectable implant for delivering micromolecules and macromolecules using poly(lactic-co-glycolic) acid (PLGA) copolymers. J. Controlled Release.27:139–147 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O. Sartor, M. K. Dineen, R. Perez-Marreno, F. M. Chu, G. J. Carron, and R. C. Tyler. An eight-month clinical study of LA-2575 30.0 mg: A new 4-month, subcutaneous delivery system for leuprolide acetate in the treatment of prostate cancer. Urology.62:319–323 (2003).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
P. Sampath and H. Brem. Implantable slow-release chemotherapeutic polymers for the treatment of malignant brain tumors. Cancer Contl.5:130–137 (1997).Google Scholar
S. R. Mallery, P. Pei, J. C. Kang, G. M. Ness, R. Ortiz, J. E. Touhalisky, and S. P. Schwendeman. Controlled-release of doxorubicin from poly(lactide-co-glycolide) microspheres significantly enhances cytotoxicity against cultured AIDS-related kaposi’s sarcoma cells. Anticancer. Res.20:2817–2825 (2000).PubMedGoogle Scholar
E. D. Crawford, O. Sartor, F. Chu, R. Perez, G. Karlin, and J. S. Garrett. A 12-month clinical study of LA-2585 (45.0 MG): A new 6-month subcutaneous delivery system for Leuprolide acetate for the treatment of prostate cancer. J. Urology.175:533–536 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
J. Westermarck and V. M. Kahari. Regulation of matrix metalloproteinase expression in turner invasion. FASEB J.13:781–792 (1999).PubMedGoogle Scholar
S. Curran and G. I. Murray. Matrix metalloproteinases in tumour invasion and metastasis. J. Pathol.189:300–308 (1999).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
S. Kurahara, M. Shinohara, T. Ikebe, S. Nakamura, M. Beppu, A. Hiraki, H. Takeuchi, and K. Shirasuna. Expression of MMPs, MT–MMP, and TIMPs in squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity: Correlations with tumor invasion and metastasis. Head. Neck—J. Sci. Spec.21:627–638 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
E. A. Garbett, M. W. R. Reed, and N. J. Brown. Proteolysis in human breast and colorectal cancer. Brit. J. Cancer.81:287–293 (1999).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
A. Franchi, M. Santucci, E. Masini, I. Sardi, M. Paglierani, and O. Gallo. Expression of matrix metalloproteinase 1, matrix metalloproteinase 2, and matrix metalloproteinase 9 in carcinoma of the head and neck—Correlation with p53 status, inducible nitric oxide synthase activity, and anigogenesis. Cancer Res.95:1902–1910 (2002).Google Scholar
P. Pei, M. P. Horan, R. Hille, C. F. Hemann, S. P. Schwendeman, and S. R. Mallery. Reduced nonprotein thiols inhibit activation and function of MMP-9: Implications for chemoprevention. Free Radical. Bio. Med.41:1315–1324 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
A. Rieutord, P. Arnaud, J. F. Dauphin, and F. Brion. Stability and compatibility of an aerosol mixture including N-acetylcysteine, netilmicin and betamethasone. Int. J. Pharm.190:103–107 (1999).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
M. Zafarullah, W. Q. Li, J. Sylvester, and M. Ahmad. Molecular mechanisms of N-acetylcysteine actions. Cell. Mol. Life. Sci.60:6–20 (2003).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
T. H. Zhou, H. Lewis, R. E. Foster, and S. P. Schwendeman. Development of a multiple-drug delivery implant for intraocular management of proliferative vitreoretinopathy. J. Controlled Release.55:281–295 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
G. Bleau, C. Giasson, and I. Brunette. Measurement of hydrogen peroxide in biological samples containing high levels of ascorbic acid. Anal. Biochem.263:13–17 (1998).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
S. A. Seo, H. S. Choi, G. Khang, J. M. Rhee, and H. B. Lee. A local delivery system for fentanyl based on biodegradable poly(l-lactide-co-glycolide) oligomer. Int. J. Pharm.239:93–101 (2002).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
S. Li, M. Vert. Crystalline oligomeric stereocomplex as an intermediate compound in racemic poly(dl-lactic acid) degradation. Polym. Int.33:37–41 (1994).Google Scholar
F. Alexis. Factors affecting the degradation and drug-release mechanism of poly(lactic acid) and poly[(lactic acid)-co-(glycolic acid)]. Polym. Int.54:36–46 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
J. C. Kang and S. P. Schwendeman. Determination of diffusion coefficient of a small hydrophobic probe in poly(lactide-co-glycolide) microparticles by laser scanning confocal microscopy. Macromolecules.36:1324–1330 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
M. Benrahmoune, M. Ghassah, and Z. Abedinzadeh. Superoxide radicals action on N-acetylcysteine. J. Chim. Phys. PCB.94:257–261 (1997).Google Scholar
G. A. Bagiyan, I. K. Koroleva, N. V. Soroka, and A. V. Ufimtsev. Oxidation of thiol compounds by molecular oxygen in aqueous solutions. Russ. Chem. B+.52:1135–1141 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
M. Benrahmoune, P. Therond, and Z. Abedinzadeh. The reaction of superoxide radical with N-acetylcysteine. Free Radical. Bio. Med.29:775–782 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
H. O. M. Yamamoto, Y. Ogawa, T. Miyagawa. US Patent 4,728,721 (1988).Google Scholar
J. Inczedy and J. Marothy. Metal-Complexes of N–Acetyl–Cysteine. Acta. Chim. Hung.86:1–2 (1975).Google Scholar
V. Smuleac, D. A. Butterfield, S. K. Sikdar, R. S. Varma, and D. Bhattacharyya. Polythiol-functionalized alumina membranes for mercury capture. J. Membrane Sci.251:169–178 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
M. Ara, M. Watanabe, and Y. Imai. Effect of blending calcium compounds on hydrolytic degradation of poly(dl-lactic acid-co-glycolic acid). Biomaterials.23:2479–2483 (2002).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Y. Zhang, S. Zale, L. Sawyer, and H. Bernstein. Effects of metal salts on poly(dl-lactide-co-glycolide) polymer hydrolysis. J. Biomed. Mater. Res.34:531–538 (1997).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lesson 2: Problem formulation
“The mere formulation of a problem is far more essential than its solution, which may be merely a matter of mathematical or experimental skill. To raise new questions, new possibilities, to regard old problems from a new angle requires creative imagination and marks real advances in science.”
– Albert Einstein
What is a problem formulation?
The problem formulation consists of just one sentence and should make it clear to everyone what research problem, you aim to address and to whom and where it is relevant. In other words, the problem formulation is the heart (or core) of your thesis to which you should always return if you lose track during your further research and writing process.
Listen to a student’s thoughts on problem formulation:
The problem formulation is based on the rationale you reached through your explorative search and may be the first thing you write related to your thesis. The aim of a problem formulation is also to set a framework for your research and a good problem formulation is essential for completing a good study.
Example of a problem formulation:
“Is the level of knowledge on recommended nutritional practices related to the nutritional status of pregnant women attending antenatal care in Northern Uganda?”
What is the problem addressed: Gap in evidence whether nutritional knowledge gained during antenatal care influences the nutritional status of pregnant women.
To whom and/or where is the problem relevant: Pregnant women attending antenatal care in Northern Uganda.
It is an iterative process to write a problem formulation. You might switch many times between checking the literature to see if your idea is relevant and refining the problem formulation, back to searching the literature with new ideas, etc. It takes a long time to develop a precise and specific problem formulation but as Albert Einstein wrote it is necessary to define your problem before any work can be launched.
In practise, writing of the final project formulation is done in interaction with your supervisor. This process is described in the lesson: “Meeting the supervisor”.
When your problem formulation has taken its final form, you are ready to develop an overall research objective and a number of specific objectives stating exactly what actions will be taken in order to address your stated problem.
A proper problem formulation and associated objectives will make your work more coherent
Do you now know how to write a problem formulation? Test your knowledge in the following.